And so, as we teeter on the edge of the fiscal cliff, Norman Ornstein, an eminent scholar of the history of Congress, comes up with an idea for averting catastrophe.  We'll be reading Ornstein's book, written with Tom Mann of the Brookings Institution, this spring.  Meanwhile, prepare for some choppy waters.

Left to right:  Ken Kolson, Joe Sadek, Laura Allen, Mike McCandlish. 

The Case for Policy Wonks

The late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, one of my personal heroes, famously said that "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts."  That's another way of stating the position argued by Dylan Matthews in an op-ed piece in today's Washington Post.  Matthews advocates investing in the kind of non-partisan research associated with the Government Accountability Office, the Congressional Research Service, and the Congressional Budget Office.  Lawmakers will always argue about the ends of public policy, Matthews concedes, but there shouldn't be so much confusion about the facts; we ought to have a better idea, for example, of which means are appropriate for the promotion of particular ends. And about how much it's going to cost.

I'm hoping that the Spring 2013 Glenn Fellows will take a very close look at Matthews's piece as they think about possible policy paper topics for next semester.  And I'm hoping that they come away from the WAIP program with a nuanced idea of the "facts" and the extent to which they can be expected to inform public policy.